Entertainment News

The Frasier reboot is the ultimate example of a bad TV revival

By Chris Snellgrove | Published

In the waning months of December, I found myself indulging in my usual holiday tradition of watching Christmas episodes of my favorite sitcoms. Thanks to Hulu’s order of holiday episodes (why do only major broadcasters do this?), it was easy enough to find the right episodes, and I ended up binge-watching them all FrasierChristmas episodes. In some ways they were better than I remembered, but like Lillith’s arrival at the Christmas party, one thing spoiled my joy: remembering that Frasier The reboot is relatively bad and may be the best example of a bad TV revival.

Frasier Reboot Plot

If you haven’t had the dubious pleasure of dealing with Frasier start over, here’s the sequence: we start with our titular character at a crossroads after her father’s death, Charlotte leaving her, and her talk show Dr. Phil-esque comes to an end. He decides to start over, returning to Boston to start a new teaching gig at Harvard while rekindling his relationship with his son. However, everything from the difficulty of solving a new job to finding a common culture with his firefighter son serves as a constant reminder that even though Frasier is old, he’s not all that wise.

Why is it Bad

Since that snapshot comes out faster than Eddie running to the bathroom, why do I think that Frasier reboot is the ultimate example of a bad TV revival? The first and perhaps the main reason is that the main cast of the revival does not have literally all of the characters together that made the original show great. Returning actors are often relegated to small cameos, leaving audiences with new characters that aren’t as exciting or compelling as the previous batch.

That’s not the actors fault. The characters are generally talented, but as in the beginning Frasier writer Ken Levine explained to Hollywood & Levine, none of the characters in the reboot except his son has a real connection with Frasier himself. This includes Harvard professor Alan Cornwall, who is said to be a “good friend” but who “wasn’t mentioned once” Happiness or Frasier. This is a very good point, and the longer he talked, the more I realized that many of the show’s character problems are what keep bringing up (both narrative and comedic) what could be a stellar reboot.

Levine’s splits include Eve, a new mother who lives with Frasier’s son in a reboot after her firefighter boyfriend dies. Levine points out that we should ask ourselves an important question about his character’s story: “What does that have to do with Frasier?” He then asked if it was possible to “lose that character” before confidently answering his question: “it is possible.”

The last Frasier character Levine focused on was Olivia Finch, Frasier’s Dean at Harvard who is eager to hire a celebrity to teach at the university. The author asked a big question: when it comes to a prestigious university like Harvard, “what do they offer ***” in terms of recruiting famous faculty, something that would be important to “a very small college, Middlebury University built.” .” His fascination with celebrity status makes it difficult to answer “what is his role?” when it comes to carrying Frasier around.

It Actually Gets Better

Reading his thoughts feels like a revelation. In fact, I felt like Frasier himself as I was talking internally about the new series, and Levine came in as Martin to talk about me in a mysterious way. A collective exhibition, by definition, nothing without its characters, and with Frasier a reboot would always succeed or fail based on the strengths of its characters. But in comparing the old Frasier in the new reboot, it’s easy to see that the characters of the new show have failed at everything.

Anyway, everything FrasierMistakes didn’t stop the reboot from getting a second season, and that season should (should) have been able to develop its existing characters while bringing back the original fan-favorite character Roz Doyle. While Season 1 was the ultimate example of a bad TV revival, Season 2 seems like the show is moving forward (if slowly, and still with bad characters) in the right direction. And that leaves us with a character worthy of the classic Frasier A Christmas episode: that it’s never too late for even the worst of us to work towards becoming better.



Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button