Star Trek Head says it’s okay to make bad movies because Star Trek is a safe space

By Joshua Tyler | Published 1 hour ago

Everyone talks about star trek again. Unfortunately, they talked about it according to the condition of the dead franchise.

If you want to charge for the death of someone, you may have put it on Alex Kurtzman. He had a franchise since 2009 Star Trek. He is a manufacturer and just released + Star Trek: Section 31A direct movie that is so well that the stars of astrologers have responded to our volume and voted for a paramoous to be an internet.

So what happened? What is Alex Kurtzman about himself? His reply, briefly, are: This: Star Trek is a safe space, so it’s okay to make a bad movie.

Has my funphation is exaggeration? Here is a direct measure from his interview with Trekmovie, where he asked him to say about worried followers in paragraph 31.

“I think you’re inclined to find Star Trek because you feel somehow like you don’t match, right?

After the quotation, he introduced a salad of “protection of our freedom,” and then, slipped down. He tried to argue with the best way to prevent Geene Roddenberry dream of a bright future to make awkward movies to do horrible things that do horrible things.

Here is Kurtzman:

“Finally, I feel like what we say to have a starfleet and that’s a good idea Roddenderry who had this idea to be in the concept, you need people work in the shadows.

The head of Alex Kurtzman, no such thing as a bright and happy future because you can have one if it is equal to something bad. On Alex Kurtzman’s Star Trek, Geene Roddenberry dream cannot be.

He continued to try to look at his failure with LGBTQ + Conography, saying about his bad movie, “and that way, I think it’s another color in the Star Trek.

In my 0-star review Star Trek: Section 31, I asked if the film was the basic. Now Star Trek followers have the answer. If you want the bad, don’t look more than Alex Kurtzman.