Garth Brooks’ Sexual Harassment Accuser Responds To Him Revealing Her Name

Garth Brooks
Jason Kempin/Getty ImagesA suspicious woman Garth Brooks A sexual assault victim has criticized him for going public as he seeks compensatory and punitive damages after his claims.
In a statement provided to Us Weekly On Tuesday, October 8, the team of lawyers for Brooks, 62, “just revealed himself.” The accuser’s statement came not even hours after Brooks filed a claim that the accuser leaked Brooks’ name with allegations that he wanted to “discredit” the singer. Brooks filed the complaint “to preserve his dignity [and] confirm the truth.”
“Garth Brooks has just revealed his true self. Despite the punishment, he publicly named the rape victim,” the statement said Us with Douglas H. Wigdor, Jeanne M. Christensen again Hayley Bakerlearn. “Without legal reasons, Brooks kicked him out because he thought the rules didn’t apply to him. On behalf of our client, we will then seek to obtain as many sanctions as possible on this as soon as possible.”
Brooks’ complaint, filed in the District Court of the Southern District of Mississippi Northern Division on Tuesday and received by. Usexplains the country singer’s allegations that his name came out while he was waiting for the judge to sign his file where he will use the name to name both sides.
Brooks’ filing, as a “John Doe,” reads, “When Jane Roe threatened to publish falsehoods about her – intending to trick the Plaintiff into paying her millions of dollars – the Plaintiff filed this lawsuit to preserve her reputation, find the truth, and put.” his strategy is stopped. Out of respect for his family, and out of respect for Roe’s family as well, Plaintiff called this action ‘John Doe vs. Jane Roe.’”
Brooks’ filing also alleged that his accuser gave the court “less than 48 hours after objection before disclosing the identity of the Appellant to the media.” Because of this, Brooks’ attorneys said that her fake name testimony was “inaccurate” and that she will file her complaint using both of their names.
In a second filing filed Tuesday, Brooks identified himself and his accuser by name, saying she accused him of sexual harassment after she did not agree to his “demands for paid employment and medical benefits.”
Brooks claims that her accuser “threatened” in a July 17 letter to “publicize” her “made-up allegations” unless she “agreed to pay the Defendant millions of dollars to not press charges.” (His book is said to have come about because of the “financial problems” he encountered when he moved to Mississippi, according to Brooks’ filing.)
In the alleged follow-up letter, the accuser “asked not to publicly file her false and defamatory case in exchange for a multibillion-dollar settlement,” according to the documents.
Brooks maintains that the allegations made by the accuser, who was a hairdresser who worked for Brooks in 2019, are “not true.” He also asked for an award of “compensatory damages,” caused by “plaintiff’s intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, and simple false invasion of privacy,” and “punitive damages in an amount sufficient to deter future similar conduct.”
Brooks was named in a complaint filed on Thursday, October 3, in which he said he raped an unidentified woman in 2019 while working for her as a hairdresser. (CNN originally reported the news.)
In the case, which was discovered by Usthe accuser alleges that he began working for Brooks in 2017 after working for his wife, Trisha Yearwood. The accuser said Brooks sent her sexually suggestive messages, repeatedly exposed her private parts in front of her and made “repeated comments” about having a “threesome” with Yearwood, 60.
In the weeks leading up to the Oct. 3 filing, Brooks filed his own complaint alleging that the accuser was trying to defraud and defame him with “false allegations.”
“Defendant’s allegations are untrue,” Brooks’ original plea read. “The defendant is well aware, however, of the great, irreparable damage such false allegations can do to the plaintiff’s well-earned reputation as a decent and caring person, as well as the inevitable damage to his family and the irreparable damage to his career and livelihood. would be the result if he accepted his threat to ‘make public’ his false accusation.”
Source link